Skip to content
BombersFM

One Rep Max Calculator

Estimate your one-rep max (1RM) for any lift from reps at a lighter weight. See Epley, Brzycki, Lombardi, and Mayhew estimates plus a full percentage training-load table.

lb ยท kg
reps

Estimates are most accurate for 10 reps or fewer.

Estimated one-rep max (avg of 4 formulas)

262

Breakdown

Epley formula
263
Brzycki formula
253
Lombardi formula
264

Last updated:

Was this calculator helpful?

FAQ

Which 1RM formula is most accurate?

Epley tends to be most accurate for 3-10 rep sets on compound lifts, while Brzycki is slightly better under 6 reps. This calculator averages all four major formulas, which reduces individual bias โ€” expect results within 5% of a true max.

Why estimate instead of testing a true 1RM?

True max attempts carry injury risk and require near-perfect technique and arousal. Rep-max estimation (a hard set of 3-8) tracks within ~5-10% and lets you train hard week after week. Many programs are built entirely on estimated maxes.

How do I use percentages in training?

Strength blocks commonly use 80-90% for sets of 3-6, hypertrophy work uses 65-80% for 8-12 reps, and speed work uses 50-60%. The table above maps each percentage to a working load rounded to the nearest 2.5 units.

One Rep Max Calculator: Estimate Your 1RM From Any Set

Your one-rep max (1RM) โ€” the heaviest weight you can lift once with good form โ€” is the reference point for all strength training. But testing it weekly is risky and exhausting. This free one rep max calculator estimates your 1RM from any hard set of 1โ€“15 reps, averages four research-backed formulas, and generates a complete percentage-based training table.

How the One Rep Max Calculator Works

Four established formulas convert a rep-max set into an estimated 1RM:

  • Epley (1985): 1RM = w ร— (1 + reps/30)
  • Brzycki (1993): 1RM = w ร— 36 / (37 โˆ’ reps)
  • Lombardi (1989): 1RM = w ร— reps^0.10
  • Mayhew (1992): 1RM = w ร— 100 / (52.2 + 41.9 ร— e^(โˆ’0.055 ร— reps))

Each was derived from different lifter populations, so each is slightly biased. Averaging them cancels individual bias โ€” expect the result within about 5% of a true max. Estimates are most accurate for sets of 10 reps or fewer.

Worked Example

You squat 225 lb for a hard set of 5:

  1. Epley: 225 ร— (1 + 5/30) = 262.5
  2. Brzycki: 225 ร— 36 / 32 = 253.1
  3. Lombardi: 225 ร— 5^0.10 = 259.4
  4. Mayhew: 225 ร— 100 / (52.2 + 41.9 ร— e^(โˆ’0.275)) = 255.0

Average: โ‰ˆ 258 lb estimated 1RM โ€” and the table shows your 90% training weight is 230 lb, 80% is 205 lb, and so on.

Why Estimate Instead of Maxing?

True 1RM attempts demand perfect technique under maximal load โ€” where injury risk peaks โ€” plus heavy fatigue that disrupts the following week of training. Rep-max estimation (a grinder set of 3โ€“8 reps at 80โ€“90% effort) gives coaches and programs 95% of the programming value at a fraction of the risk. The one caveat: the farther your rep count drifts past 10, the more formula estimates diverge, because muscular endurance starts contaminating the math. A set of 5 is the sweet spot.

Using the Percentage Table

Strength programs speak in percentages of 1RM. The classic zones:

| % of 1RM | Reps possible | Purpose | |---|---|---| | 90โ€“100% | 1โ€“3 | Max strength | | 80โ€“90% | 3โ€“6 | Strength + some size | | 70โ€“80% | 8โ€“12 | Hypertrophy (muscle growth) | | 60โ€“70% | 12โ€“15 | Volume, technique, deload |

The calculator rounds working loads to the nearest 2.5 lb/kg โ€” the smallest plate increment on most bars โ€” so every prescribed weight is actually loadable in the gym.

Tracking Progress Over Time

Estimated 1RM shines as a progress tracker. Re-test with the same lift and rep scheme every 4โ€“8 weeks: if 225 ร— 5 becomes 235 ร— 5, your estimated max climbed from ~258 to ~269 lb without ever risking a max attempt. Over months, this trend line โ€” not any single number โ€” tells you whether your program is working. When your estimate rises, recalculate all your percentage-based training weights; grinding old numbers shortchanges progress.

For the energy side of training, pair this with our TDEE calculator and macro calculator โ€” strength gains need both stimulus and fuel.

Estimates assume healthy joints, proper warm-up, and clean technique. Never sacrifice form chasing a number, and use a spotter or safety pins for heavy squat and bench work.

Related Calculators